Skip to main content

Assessment of intestinal parasites in the coexisting Bombus terrestris (Apidae) and Xylocopa augusti (Apidae) in central Chile

Abstract

Bombus terrestris is a European bumblebee extensively commercialized worldwide for crop pollination. In Chile, this species was introduced in 1997 and after confinement escape, it has spread and established in several localities of central-southern Chile and in the Argentine Patagonia. The South American carpenter bee Xylocopa augusti, in turn, has been recently reported in central Chile, and as B. terrestris, this species has become increasingly common, often found in sympatry with B. terrestris in some localities. While intestinal parasites such as the flagellate trypanosome Crithidia bombi, the microsporidium Nosema bombi, and the neogregarine protozoan Apicystis bombi, show high levels of specialization on the Bombus genus, parasites often increase their host range, especially after invading novel habitats, hence creating new infection disease scenarios. In this work, we used molecular techniques to detect the presence of the intestinal pathogens of B. terrestris in coexisting X. augusti from different localities in the Metropolitan Region of Chile. Our results revealed the presence of the three pathogens in B. terrestris only, with population prevalence broadly similar to that reported in other studies. The carpenter bee X. augusti did not show evidence of any of the three parasites examined, indicating that this invader species is not recipient of any of the parasite species present in B. terrestris.

Introduction

Pathogen spillover, broadly defined as the transfer of one or more pathogens from one reservoir host to a recipient host is one of the major factors influencing disease spread in natural populations. Spillover often occurs when infected host species invade novel habitats and transmit exotic parasites to native hosts, which often experience substantial reduction in reproduction and survival [1, 2]. Pathogen spillover occurs commonly in bee colonies transported from one region to another for commercial purposes because commercially-reared colonies often harbor parasites harmful to wild bees, resulting in disease epidemics, and native bee declines in wild populations [3,4,5]. In this regard, Bombus terrestris Linnaeus (Apidae) (Fig. 1a), one of the most extensively used bumblebee species for crop pollination worldwide has been suggested to transmit their parasites to recipient native bees in southern South America [6, 7]. One of the parasites commonly harbored by B. terrestris is Crithidia bombi Lipa & Triggiani, a flagellated trypanosome species that infects exclusively species of the Bombus genus. This protozoan is horizontally transmitted by ingestion of infectious cells present in the feces deposited on flowers by infected workers of other colonies or bumblebee species, by contaminated honey stores and nest material, and through vertical transmission from one generation to another within the same colony [8, 9]. Like C. bombi, the microsporidium Nosema bombi Fantham & Porter, infects exclusively species of the Bombus genus. The spores (infective stages) locate mostly in the digestive tract of the bumble bees, and after proliferation within the host, are released into the environment [10, 11]. As in C. bombi, this parasite transmits vertically across generations in bumble bees [12]. Finally, Apicystis bombi Liu, Macfarlane & Pengelly, is a neogregarine protozoan that in addition to Bombus species, infects Apis mellifera, and Osmia bicornis Linnaeus (Megachilidae). It locates in the host adipose tissue, reducing the colony establishment success [12]. Its transmission is horizontal through shared flower resources, but vertical transmission has also been suggested [13].

Fig. 1
figure1

Photographs of the bee species here examined for intestinal parasites. a Bombus terrestris, b Xylocopa augusti (female), c Xylocopa augusti (male) (photograph credit https://www.mnhn.gob.cl/613)

Fig. 2
figure2

Map showing the study sites in the Metropolitan Region where specimens were collected. In total, 13 campaigns were carried out. Parentheses indicate the number of visits to the same site: Ñuñoa (3), Puente Alto (2), La Florida (3), Talagante (3), and La Reina (2). Circles: sites where B. terrestris and X. augusti were collected; triangle: sites where only B. terrestris was collected; square: sites where only X. augusti was collected

In Chile, B. terrestris was imported for tomato pollination in 1997/1998. After greenhouse confinement escape, it has spread and become established in several localities of southern Chile and Argentina (see reviews in [6, 14]). In 2009, the presence of C. bombi and A. bombi was reported for the first time in South America [15]. Since then, further reports have confirmed that invasion of B. terrestris to novel habitats in southern Chile and Argentina carried exotic intestinal parasites [6, 16], hence increasing the chance of pathogen spillover to other bee species. For example, after B. terrestris invasion, C. bombi was detected in the native bumblebee Bombus dahlbomii Guérin-Méneville in Chile [6], and A. bombi was recorded in the honeybee Apis mellifera in Argentina [17, 18], which strongly suggests parasite spillover from B. terrestris to other bee species in southern south America [2].

A recently reported invasive bee species in Chile is the South American carpenter bee Xylocopa augusti Lepeletier (Fig. 1b and c). Originally distributed in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, and Paraguay, this species was recorded for the first time in central Chile in 2013, probably transported through undetected nests in packaging structures from Argentina [19]. After its arrival, new ecological scenarios of coexistence between otherwise allopatric X. augusti and B. terrestris are frequently found in central Chile, providing new opportunities for parasite transmission. It is known that parasite transmission is an expected result when founding populations in novel habitats are genetically depauperate [20, 21]. In principle, judging by the pathogens found in B. terrestris and other Xylocopa species, X. augusti has the potential to become infected by some viruses such as DWV (Deformed wing virus), BQCV (Black queen cell virus), and SBPV (Slow bee paralysis virus), all of them detected in B. terrestris also [22, 23]. However, as most studies inquiring on the potential transmission of parasites from B. terrestris to other bee species in southern South America have focused almost exclusively on intestinal parasites, and molecular diagnosis techniques for viral testing require a methodology different to that used in this study [24, 25], we restricted the analysis to the molecular detection of the protozoans C. bombi and A. bombi, and the microsporidium N. bombi in B. terrestris and X. augusti.

Methods

Overall, 59 specimens of the two species combined were collected from the total 26 campaigns performed to different localities in the Metropolitan Region, Santiago, during October–December 2018 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Individuals were collected in three sites where both species were observed foraging in the same plants and in sites where only one of the species was found, one site per species. Even though campaigns were conceived to check the presence or absence of the focal species, B. terrestris and X. augusti, no native bee species was observed. The only additional bee present in some sites was the honeybee A. mellifera. Specimens of the focal bees were captured using entomological nets, euthanized in killing jars, and stored in 95% alcohol at − 20 °C until processing. At the laboratory, separate dissecting tools were used to avoid cross-contamination between samples, and utensils and working place were submitted to 30 min UV-light before sample processing. Each insect was cleaned with bi-distilled water and then subjected to abdominal extrusion to obtain the intestine and intestinal content. To evaluate the status of infection of the collected samples, and the parasite species involved, whole DNA was extracted from the insect guts dissected, using the EZNA Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of the specific parasites was evaluated by PCR amplification of the small ribosome subunit of each parasite. Primers used in this work are listed in Table 2. They were designed from the following sequences: Apicystis bombi (accession no. FN546182), Crithidia bombi (accession no. GU321194) and Nosema bombi (accession no. AY741110). Specific primers for B. terrestris and X. augusti to be used as positive PCR controls, were designed from the partial mitochondrial genome from B. terrestris (accession no. KT164618) and from the partial COI gene from Xylocopa violacea Linnaeus (accession no. EU122101), respectively. The COI gene from X. violacea was used for primer design as no X. augusti DNA sequences were found at the NCBI database when this study was performed. PCR reactions were performed using a Thermal Cycler 2720 (Applied Biosystems) in a final volume of 25 μl containing 1x PCR buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM KCl), 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1 μM of each primer, 2 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 100–130 ng of template DNA. The PCR parameters were: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 53 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Then, a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min was applied and samples were kept at 4 °C until evaluated by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis in TAE buffer stained with SafeView™ Plus (Applied Biological Materials). To confirm the obtained results, some amplicons were sequenced at the service provided by the Sequencing Unit, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Santiago, Chile) using ABI PRISM 3500 xl (Applied Biosystems). The obtained sequences were analyzed and compared with the GenBank database using the BLAST algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

Table 1 Number of individuals screened and infected with each parasite per site and bee species. The number of PCR products sequenced is indicated in parenthesis
Table 2 List of primers used in PCR. See Methods section for details

Results and discussion

Among the total 26 bumblebees screened, seven tested positive for the neogregarine A. bombi (26.9%), six for the trypanosome C. bombi (23.07%), and two for the microsporidium N. bombi (7.69%) (Table 1). Among the seven specimens infected with A. bombi, two of them were also infected with C. bombi and both specimens infected with N. bombi, were also infected with C. bombi. To confirm these results, four A. bombi (accession numbers MT856196, MT856197, MT856198 and MT856199), five C. bombi (accession no. MT856200, MT856201, MT856202, MT856203 and MT856204) and the two N. bombi (accession no. MT856205 and MT856206) PCR products were sequenced. In all cases, the BLAST search revealed over 99% of identity with the corresponding DNA sequences from A. bombi, C. bombi and N. bombi deposited at the NCBI-database, being 100% of identity in most cases (Table 3), confirming that the primers used in this work were successful to identify the parasites under study.

Table 3 BLASTn search results of parasite PCR products. The best alignment between the query sequence and the found sequence is shown in each case

Unlike B. terrestris, no parasite was detected in the 33 specimens of X. augusti here examined, suggesting that regardless of the status of coexistence with B. terrestris, parasites are not present in X. augusti (Table 1). To confirm this result, primers were designed in order to differentiate between B. terrestris and X. augusti DNA (primer pairs BT-F/BT-R and XA-F/XA-R, respectively) (Table 2). PCR products of the expected size were obtained from the 26 B. terrestris samples and none from the 33 X. augusti samples when using primer pair BT-F/BT-R. Accordingly, PCR products of the expected size were only obtained from the 33 X. augusti samples and none from the 26 B. terrestris samples when using primer pair XA-F/XA-R. A PCR product from each case was randomly selected and sequenced. The BLAST analysis of the PCR product from a B. terrestris sample (accession no. MT862773) revealed 100% of identity with the partial mitochondrial genome from B. terrestris and the analysis of the PCR product from a X. augusti sample (accession no. MT862774) revealed 90.7% of identity with the partial COI gene sequence from X. violacea. These results indicate that the quality of DNA samples from X. augusti specimens was adequate to perform PCR analysis, which supports the absence of the three parasites in these samples.

The prevalence of A. bombi in B. terrestris specimens collected in this work was 26.9%, which is less than the prevalence obtained in a comparable study carried out in Argentina where 14 out of 30 individuals were infected (47%) [16]. Regarding the detection of C. bombi, all the sites where B. terrestris was present had individuals infected with the protozoan, reaching an overall prevalence of 23.1%, which is in the range of values previously reported for populations sampled near Santiago ([6], 0–41.7%). This result is consistent with the observation that C. bombi is very widespread and abundant wherever B. terrestris is found [6]. Regarding N. bombi, the results obtained in this work indicate a low prevalence of this microsporidium (7.7%), probably because this parasite is more infectious in larvae than in adult bumblebees [26]. Interestingly, Schmid-Hempel et al. [6] did not record the presence of this parasite in B. terrestris populations near Santiago. Likewise, the prevalence of N. bombi in the 12 Chilean populations sampled in 2010 ranged from 0 to 3.7%, with an average prevalence of 1.7% [6], indicating that even if small, our recordings are the highest prevalence recorded for B. terrestris in Chile.

Results from this study indicate that the exotic bee, X. augusti, is not infected by any of the three parasites infecting B. terrestris, suggesting that transmission of pathogens typical of the Bombus genus does not proceed from B. terrestris to sympatric X. augusti. This result is not necessarily unexpected as the pathogens here examined are often considered specific to the Bombus genus. However, as intestinal parasites represent only a fraction of the potential pathogens transmitted (i.e., viruses should also be considered), we cannot rule out completely the idea of parasite transmission from one species to another, especially considering that susceptibility to new parasites is high in novel hosts [27], and new parasites often experience drastic changes in life history traits that permit them to infect novel hosts [28]. While the co-invasion of B. terrestris and X. augusti to Chile has created a new zone of geographical sympatry for the two otherwise allopatric species, the consequence of their coexistence for disease spread is unknown. Although our data suggests absence of intestinal parasite transmission between hosts, works that consider a broader spectrum of intestinal and viral parasites are needed. This information is crucial to understand the extent to which new contexts of host sympatry in species outside their original habitats influence and amplify parasite transmission in novel environments.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Sequence data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in GenBank with the accession codes MT856196, MT856197, MT856198, MT856199, MT856200, MT856201, MT856202, MT856203, MT856204, MT856205, MT856206, MT862773, MT862774.

References

  1. 1.

    Power AG, Mitchell CE. Pathogen spillover in disease epidemics. Am Nat. 2004;164:S79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    IPBES. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. In: Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Ngo HT, editors. . Bonn: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Otterstatter MC, Thomson JD. Does pathogen spillover from commercially reared bumble bees threaten wild pollinators. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Colla SR, Otterstatter MC, Gegear RJ, Thomson JD. Plight of the bumble bee: pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations. Biol Conserv. 2006;129:461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Goka K, Okabe K, Yoneda M. Worldwide migration of parasitic mites as a result of bumblebee commercialization. Popul Ecol. 2006;48:285–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schmid-Hempel R, Eckhardt M, Goulson D, Heinzmann D, Lange C, Plischuk S, et al. The invasion of southern South America by imported bumblebees and associated parasites. J Anim Ecol. 2014;83:823–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Aizen MA, Smith-Ramírez C, Morales CL, Vieli L, Sáez A, Barahona-Segovia RM, et al. Coordinated species importation policies are needed to reduce serious invasions globally: the case of alien bumblebees in South America. J Appl Ecol. 2018;56:100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Durrer S, Schmid-Hempel P. Shared use of flowers leads to horizontal pathogen transmission. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1994;258:299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Imhoof B, Schmid-Hempel P. Colony success of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, in relation to infections by two protozoan parasites, Crithidia bombi and Nosema bombi. Insect Soc. 1999;46:233–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McIvor CA, Malone LA. Nosema bombi, a microsporidian pathogen of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris (L.). NZ J Zool. 1995;22:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Otti O, Schmid-Hempel P. Nosema bombi: a pollinator parasite with detrimental fitness effects. J Invertebr Pathol. 2007;96:118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rutrecht ST, Brown MJF. The life-history impact and implications of multiple parasites for bumble bee queens. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:799–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Graystock P, Goulson D, Hughes WOH. Parasites in bloom: flowers aid dispersal and transmission of pollinator parasites within and between bee species. Proc R Soc B. 2015;282:20151371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Morales CL, Arbetman MP, Cameron SA, Aizen MA. Rapid ecological replacement of a native bumble bee by invasive species. Front Ecol Environ. 2013;11:529–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Plischuk S, Lange CE. Invasive Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) parasitized by a flagellate (Euglenozoa: Kinetoplastea) and a neogregarine (Apicomplexa: Neogregarinorida). J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;102:263–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Arbetman MP, Meeus I, Morales CL, Aizen MA, Smagghe G. Alien parasite hitchhikes to Patagonia on invasive bumblebee. Biol Invasions. 2013;15:489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lipa JJ, Triggiani O. Apicystis gen nov and Apicystis bombi (Liu, Macfarlane & Pengelly) comb nov (Protozoa: Neogregarinida), a cosmopolitan parasite of Bombus and Apis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie. 1996;27:29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Plischuk S, Meeus I, Smagghe G, Lange CE. Apicystis bombi (Apicomplexa: Neogregarinorida) parasitizing Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Argentina. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011;3:565–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Montalva JM, Allendes JL, Lucia M. The large carpenter bee Xylocopa augusti (Hymenoptera: Apidae): new record for Chile. J Melittol. 2013;12:1–6.

  20. 20.

    Whitehorn PR, Tinsley MC, Brown MJF, Darvill B, Goulson D. Genetic diversity, parasite prevalence and immunity in wild bumblebees. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2011;278:1195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jones CM, Brown MJF. Parasites and genetic diversity in an invasive bumblebee. J Anim Ecol. 2014;83:1428–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lucia M, Reynaldi FJ, Sguazza GH, Abrahamovich AH. First detection of deformed wing virus in Xylocopa augusti larvae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Argentina. J Apic Res. 2014;53:466–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tehel A, Brown MJ, Paxton RJ. Impact of managed honey bee viruses on wild bees. Curr Opin Virol. 2016;19:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Meeus I, De Graaf DC, Jans K, Smagghe G. Multiplex PCR detection of slowly-evolving trypanosomatids and neogregarines in bumblebees using broad-range primers. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109:107–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    De Miranda JR, Bailey L, Ball BV, Blanchard P, Budge GE, Chejanovsky N, et al. Standard methods for virus research in Apis mellifera. J Apic Res. 2013;52:1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rutrecht ST, Klee J, Brown MJ. Horizontal transmission success of Nosema bombi to its adult bumble bee hosts: effects of dosage, spore source and host age. Parasitology. 2007;134:1719–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tepolt CK, Darling JA, Blakeslee AMH, Fowler AE, Torchin ME, Miller AW, et al. Recent introductions reveal differential susceptibility to parasitism across an evolutionary mosaic. Evol Appl. 2020;13:545–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kelehear C, Brown GP, Shine R. Rapid evolution of parasite life history traits on an expanding range-edge. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:329–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dra. Marina Arbetman for kindly providing samples of B. terrestris infected with C. bombi, and A. bombi DNA samples. Dra. C. Botto-Mahan provided useful comments on a preliminary version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grant FONDECYT 1180850 to RM.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KF collected the samples, carried out the experiments and interpreted the results. DS contributed with the molecular analysis. JA and RM contributed to the study design and analysis of the results. RM conceived the study and participated in the experimental design and coordination. KF, JA and RM drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Medel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández, K., Alcaíno, J., Sepúlveda, D. et al. Assessment of intestinal parasites in the coexisting Bombus terrestris (Apidae) and Xylocopa augusti (Apidae) in central Chile. Rev. Chil. de Hist. Nat. 93, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-020-00096-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Apicystis bombi
  • Crithidia bombi
  • Nosema bombi
  • Pathogen spillover