Skip to main content
Download PDF

Avocado crops as a floral resource for native bees of Chile

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural volume 93, Article number: 5 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chile is the second largest avocado producer in the world. However, there have been few studies on interactions between native bees and avocado pollination in a Chilean environment. The flowering period of avocado is very sensitive to temperature fluctuations and so environmental conditions, particularly cool temperatures, can have a strong influence on its floral behaviour. Thus, we aimed to determine whether temperature also influences bee visitation rates to avocado flowers or if this was due to the number of available flowers. Moreover, we proposed to verify the attractiveness of avocado flowers to native bees and compare flower handling time and type of floral resource collected between managed and native bees.

Methods

An avocado orchard of “Hass” cultivar located in the Mediterranean region of Chile was studied during the flowering season of 2016. The frequency of exotic and native bee species in flowers, floral phenology, and environmental temperature were analysed, and the foraging behaviours of exotic and native bee species in avocado flowers compared.

Results

Five Chilean native and two exotic species were recorded visiting avocado flowers at the studied orchard. The bees generally sought nectar rather than pollen. The European honeybee (Apis mellifera) was the most frequent flower visitor, followed by the native species Colletes cyanescens and Cadeguala occidentalis. There was a strong positive correlation between temperature and number of visits, but no significant correlation between number of open flowers and number of visits.

Conclusions

Native Chilean bees visited avocado flowers and some of them were frequent floral visitors. They generally sought for nectar rather than pollen and were as fast as honeybees handling avocado flowers. The environmental temperature plays a key role in the frequency of bees in avocado flowers. The warmer weather is related to the higher number of bees visits to avocado flowers.

Background

Avocado (Persea americana Mill., Lauraceae) is a native tree species of Central America and Mexico, and is cultivated in countries including Chile, Israel, Mexico and South Africa, as well as in many other parts of the world [1,2,3,4]. However, low avocado yields as consequence of the poor fruit-set remain a challenge for avocado growers in many regions [5]. Pollination is considered a determining component for the success of fruit formation in avocado orchards [6,7,8]. The lack of cross-pollination can seriously limit fruit formation and reduce crop yields [5, 9,10,11].

Although avocado flowers are hermaphroditic, female and male parts are functional at different times resulting in temporal separation of the sexes [12]. Thus, avocado flowers typically open twice in a day: first as female and then as male, or vice versa [13]. Successful pollination of avocado occurs only when flowers in the female stage receive pollen from flowers in the male stage [14]. This flower-opening pattern is recognized as a mechanism that stresses the need for pollen vectors to facilitate cross-pollination between plants [9, 15, 16].

Although the massive blooming of avocado involving dozens of thousands of clustered small flowers can offer a large amount of reward to attract local visitors [17], less than 1% of the flowers produce fruit at harvest [18,19,20,21,22]. Pollinator activity in an orchard is usually not sufficient to fertilize all flowers and so yields are lower than the potential [17].

Likely pollinators of native avocado populations are species of stingless bees (Meliponinae) and wasps [3, 23]. European honeybee hives are commercially introduced to most avocado orchards during bloom to provide pollination service, which can significantly improve fruit set [8]. However, avocado did not coevolve with honeybees and has floral traits that make it less attractive to them than to its native pollinators [3, 23]. Furthermore, honeybees reduce their visits to avocado flowers when there are other flowering plants nearby [3, 15, 24, 25]. This is particularly evident in regions with a Mediterranean climate because the flowering season of avocado and the peak blooming season of local plants overlap, thereby putting them in competition for pollinators. The relative attractiveness of the avocado bloom to the honeybee could be low relative to local flowers [26, 27]. When hives of honeybees are placed in avocado orchards for pollination purposes, foragers tend to abandon the orchards to visit a nearby flowering species [17].

Chile is the second largest avocado producer in the world and its growth is related to regions with Mediterranean climate [28]. Avocado cultivation started increasing dramatically in the late 1990s due to increasing demand from global markets and the development of new water and irrigation technology [29]. However, there are few studies evaluating the interactions of avocado with floral visitors in Chilean environments (e.g. [30, 31]). Besides, the role of local native bees in the pollination of avocado flowers is not yet clear. Stingless bees (Meliponini), which are the main native pollinators of avocado in its region of origin (Mexico and Central America [3, 23, 32];), do not occur in Chile, and only the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) is considered for pollination of avocado by farmers.

The flowering period of avocado is very sensitive to temperature fluctuations and so environmental conditions, particularly cool temperatures, can have a strong influence on its floral behaviour [33,34,35]. Thus, we aimed to determine whether temperature also influences bee visitation rates to avocado flowers or if this was due to the number of available flowers. Moreover, we compared visitation rates and flower-handling times between honeybees and native bees of the Mediterranean region of Chile. Thus, we asked: (1) What is the main resource (nectar or pollen) collected by the visiting bee species of avocado flowers? (2) Are there differences in flower handling for the different resources? (3) Are native bee species efficient in handling avocado flowers compared to exotic species?

Methods

Study area and studied species

The study took place in an avocado orchard of “Hass” cultivar located in Hijuelas (32°48′12.8″S 71°08′29.1″W), Valparaíso Region, Chile, between 16 and 29 September of 2016. The Hijuelas orchard encompasses 227 ha with 68 trees/ha and 10 honeybee hives/ha. The orchard contains two cultivars: “Hass” (A-type avocado) and “Edranol” (B-type avocado). Hijuelas is in the Mediterranean bioclimatic zone, which is characterized by a rainy winter, between May and August, and a long dry period, between September and April [36]. The mean annual temperature was 14.9 °C, and the mean annual precipitation was 353 mm in 2016 [37]. The surroundings of the avocado orchard are composed mostly of fragments of native vegetation. The major vegetation formation in the area is Matorral arborescente esclerófilo mediterráneo interior, an open forest formation dominated by tall shrubs like Porlieria chilensis or Cordia decandra and some trees species like Quillaja saponaria and Lithraea caustica [38].

Frequency of bees in flowers, amount of flowers and environmental temperature

Visits of bees to avocado flowers, the amount of flowers (number of open flowers/day) and environmental temperature were evaluated during 13 consecutive days of fieldwork (16–29 September 2016). Thirty “Hass” cultivar plants (three rows of 10 trees each) were randomly chosen and assigned an identification number. Three trained observers recorded all bees that contacted floral parts during four time intervals per day (9–10 h, 12–13 h, 15–16 h, 18–19 h). The observers counted all flower-visiting insects throughout the entire perimeter of the treetop (360°) for a period of 120 ± 15 s per tree. Thus, we sampled in a similarly the sunny and shaded side of the plant. In this way, taxa of visiting bees and their relative frequency in avocado flowers were determined. The number of open flowers and floral buds of three branches of each of the 10-labelled trees were counted. Environmental temperature was recorded during four time intervals (9–10 h, 12–13 h, 15–16 h, 18–19 h) during the 13-days of fieldwork using a multi-thermometer. We analysed whether the bee frequency in avocado flowers was influenced by the number of open flowers/day and the average daily temperature.

Bees foraging behaviour in flowers

The foraging behaviour of visiting bees in avocado flowers was recorded using a voice recorder in 30 “Hass” cultivar plants (three rows of 10 trees each) randomly chosen. The taxonomic identification of each individual bee, the type of floral resource collected (pollen or nectar) and the time spent visiting individual flowers (handling time) were recorded. We distinguish bees visits to collect pollen and/or nectar according to the foraging behaviour described by Is-Am & Eisikowitz [24]. We do not take pollen or nectar samples from the bees, therefore the analyses are based on the foraging behaviour of the bees. When bee identification was not possible in the field, specimens were caught with an entomological net and identified later in the laboratory. Average flower handling time was compared between exotic and native bees.

Statistical analysis

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) assessed relationships among the variables of temperature, number of open flowers and frequency of floral visits in the stats package of R version 3.3.3 [39]. The relationship among frequency of floral visits and the number of open flowers and frequency of floral visits by bees was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation (rs). A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM, Negative Binomial distribution) was used to determine which type of resource (fixed effect) was more collected by bees in avocado flowers; bee species was included as random effect. A GLMM (Negative Binomial distribution) was also used to compare visitation frequencies and flower handling times of bee species (fixed effects); the sampling date was included as random effect. The GLMMs were performed using the function glmer.rb of the R package lme4.

Results

Seven bee species were recorded visiting avocado flowers at the Hijuelas orchard in September 2016 (Fig. 1b): five native Chilean species—Colletes cyanescens (Haliday), Cadeguala occidentalis (Haliday), Callistochlora chloris (Spinola), Caupolicana gayi Spinola and Centris nigerrima (Ruiz); and two exotic species—Apis mellifera Linnaeus and Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus). Apis mellifera, the European honeybee, was the most frequent bee in the studied avocado flowers, followed by the two native species Colletes cyanescens and Cadeguala occidentalis. The other bee species were rare in avocado flowers (χ2 = 502.38, d.f. = 7, p ≤ 0.001; Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flower handling times for bee species in avocado flowers (a) and their respective frequencies (b), Hijuelas orchard, Valparaíso Region, Chile. Boxplots represent means and lines the 95% confidence interval. Statistical analyses: (a) χ2 = 6.40, d.f. = 5; p = 0.27 and (b) χ2 = 502.38, d.f. = 7; p ≤ 0.001 (GLMM, Negative Binomial distribution)

Full size image

Flower resources and handling time

The seven species of bees were observed collecting nectar and pollen in the avocado flowers. The native and exotic bee species spent similar time handling the avocado flowers (χ2 = 6.40, d.f. = 5, p = 0.27; Fig. 1a). Foraging honeybees visited about 7.5 avocado flowers per min, or about 450 flowers per hour, while native bees species visited between 8.8 and 9.6 flowers per min or 375–409 flowers per hour.

The bees collected nectar and/or pollen during visits to single flowers or they collected nectar and pollen during different visits to different flowers. Flower handling time did not differ significantly between extracting nectar and extracting pollen, and handling time to gather nectar plus pollen did not different from that for collecting nectar or pollen in the same flower (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Handling time and floral resource(s) collected by bees in avocado flowers, Hijuelas orchard, Valparaíso Region, Chile. Statistical analysis: χ2 = 192.1, d.f. = 4; p ≤ 0.001, GLMM (Negative Binomial distribution)

Full size image

The type of floral resource collected varied among bee species. The native bees Colletes cyanescens, Cadeguala occidentalis and Caupolicana gayi mainly foraged for nectar during visits to avocado flowers (Fig. 3). Apis mellifera collected proportionally less nectar, and frequently landed on flowers without effectively collecting any resource. Bees of Callistochlora chloris mostly collected pollen and nectar at the same visit. Bees of Centris nigerrima generally landed on avocado flowers without collecting a resource (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Floral resources collected by bee species in avocado flowers, Hijuelas orchard, Valparaíso Region, Chile. Black bars represent the number of visits recorded per bee species while corresponding pie charts shows the resource(s) collected during these visits (nectar, pollen, pollen and nectar or only land). We considered “only land” to be when a bee landed on a flower and did not collect any resource

Full size image

Temperature and number of open flowers

The frequency of bees in avocado flowers was related more to the temperature than to the number of open flowers (Fig. 4). There was a strong positive correlation between temperature and number of visits (rs = 0.82, p ≤ 0.001), but no significant correlation between number of open flowers and number of visits (rs = 047, p = 0.11; Fig. 5). No correlation was found between environmental temperature and the number of open avocado flowers (rs = 0.32, p = 0.23). Higher bee visitation rates were related to higher temperatures (19–22 °C).

Fig. 4
figure4

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the relationship between environmental temperature, number of open avocado flowers and bee visitation frequency, Hijuelas orchard, Valparaíso Region, Chile

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

Spearman rank correlation (rs) between mean visitation frequency of visiting bees and temperature (left side graphic) and number of open flowers (right side graphic)

Full size image

Discussion

Our results indicate that temperature might affect the frequency of bee visits to avocado flowers, with higher frequencies being related to higher temperatures in the Mediterranean region of Chile. Surprisingly, the frequency of bees in avocado flowers is not simply affected by the amount of open flowers. Accordingly, other intrinsic characteristics of the avocado flower or aspects related to the bees’ own sensitivity to cold weather could be more important variables affecting the visits. In fact, the temperature has been related to many physiological and morphological functions of the avocado flower. For example, avocado flowers are sensitive to cool temperatures, which can affect the temporal separation of male and female stages [40]. When air temperatures are below 20 °C, some overlapping of receptive stigmas and anther dehiscence occurs, which may lead to some pollination within an individual tree [33,34,35, 41]. Colder temperature also affects pollen tube growth, with 25 °C being the optimum temperature [34, 41, 42]. On the other hand, bees prefer to visit parts of the tree warmer and more exposed to sunlight, where also there is a greater number of flowers, and avoiding the shaded and colder parts [31]. Therefore, we assumed that the frequency of bees in avocado flowers is not directly affected by the amount of open flowers, but due to other morphological and physiological characteristics of the avocado flower or of the bees sensitive to the cold weather.

Apis mellifera is the only pollinator managed for commercial proposes in Chile. Indeed, the European honeybee plays a leading role in avocado pollination [8, 21]. Nonetheless, avocado flowers were also visited by the local bee community in Chile, some of which were frequent flower visitors (see also [30, 31]). However, there is no evidence supporting these native bees have specialized interactions with avocado crops. Contrariwise, these bees are considered polylectic, generalists visitors that collect pollen from both related and unrelated plant species, including natives and cultivated [43,43,44,45,47]. Therefore, it is likely that the floral visitors of avocado are shared with local native and cultivated vegetation. Consequently, the richness and abundance of bees that visit the avocado flowers are subject to the taxonomic composition, phenological fluctuations and floral morphophysiology of surrounding flowering plants, similarly to what occurs with honeybee [3, 15, 24,25,26].

Furthermore, honeybees and native bees were found to be equally fast at handling avocado flowers. Honeybees and the two most frequent native bees (Colletes cyanescens and Cadeguala occidentalis) fed on nectar and pollen in avocado flowers, however, visiting bees searched more for nectar than pollen. Many studies have suggested that nectar-feeding bees achieve more efficient pollination of avocado because they actively move between both male- and female-stage flowers, while pollen-gathering bees visit male-stage flowers more frequently [8, 21, 24, 30, 32];). Therefore, based on foraging behaviour, native species and honeybees can be equally probable pollinators of avocado plants.

However, there are few studies clarifying the role of native bee species in relation to exotic species in avocado pollination (e.g. [3, 30,31,32]). These studies consider honeybees and some native bees (not all) potentially efficient pollinators of this crop. However, other studies argue that the honeybees are the most frequent flower visitors (representing until 92.9% of all visits), usually carry avocado pollen on their body, and generally deposit intraspecific pollen in the stigmas [8, 48]. Because of that, honeybees are considered the most efficient pollinators. However, there are many more studies focusing only on the pollination effectiveness of honeybees than those that also include other local visitors. Therefore, it is still unclear whether native bees can function as supplementary or alternative pollinators when honeybee frequency reduces in flowers.

Moreover, particularities involving avocado pollination impose requirements to pollination studies. Avocado plants are characterized as having low fruit set, with values worldwide varying from 1 to 200 fruit per 100,000 flowers [10, 20, 21, 49]. Fruit set for the “Hass” cultivar in Chile can reach as low as 0.01%, or one fruit per 10,000 flowers [49]. Besides, the temporal separation of the sexes in flowers [12] requires additional attention by researchers, including cross-pollination treatments between plants in male and female stages. Due to this, pollination experiments (e.g., breeding system and fruit set, pollen flow, pollination effectiveness) on avocado require employing a huge amount of flowers to achieve a satisfactory number of samples and replicates. Despite these challenges, studies of pollination efficiency could reveal the role of Chilean native bees, in relation to exotics, in pollinating avocado flowers.

Conclusions

The number of open flowers was little correlated to the frequency of bees in avocado trees. On the other hand, the environmental temperature plays a key role in the frequency of bees in avocado flowers. The warmer weather is related to the higher number of bees visits to avocado flowers. In addition to the honeybees, the native Chilean bees visited avocado flowers. Some of these bees were frequent floral visitors of the studied avocado orchard, and generally sought nectar rather than pollen. The native and exotic bees were equally fast at handling avocado flowers to collect resources (pollen and/or nectar).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCA:

Principal Component Analysis

GLMM:

Generalized Linear Mixed Model

rs :

Spearman rank correlation

References

  1. 1.

    Chen H, Morrell PL, Ashworth VE, De La Cruz M, Clegg MT. Tracing the geographic origins of major avocado cultivars. J Hered. 2008;100(1):56–65 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esn068.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Galindo-Tovar ME, Ogata-Aguilar N, Arzate-Fernández AM. Some aspects of avocado (Persea americana mill.) diversity and domestication in Mesoamerica. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2008;55(3):441–50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9250-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ish-Am G, Barrientos-Priego F, Castañeda-Vildozola A, Gazit S. Avocado (Persea americana mill.) pollinators in its region of origin. Rev Chapingo Ser Hort. 1999;5:137–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bergh BO. Avocado research in Israel. Calif Avocado Soc Yearb. 1975;58:103–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bergh BO. Reasons for low yields of avocados. Calif Avocado Soc Yearb. 1967;51:161–72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Papademetriou MK. Some aspects of the flower behaviour, pollination and fruit set of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) in Trinidad. Calif Avocado Soc Yearb. 1976;60:106–53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stout AB. The pollination of avocados. Fla Agric Exp Stn Bull. 1933;257:1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vithanage V. The role of the European honeybee (Apis mellifera) in avocado pollination. J Hortic Sci. 1990;56:81–6 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1990.11516033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Carabalí-Banguero D, Montoya-Lerma J, Carabalí-Muñoz A. Efecto de la exclusión de insectos visitantes florales en el cuajado de frutos de Persea americana (Lauraceae) cv. Hass. Acta Zool Mex. 2018;34(1):1–9 https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2018.3412121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Evans LJ, Goodwin RM, McBrydie HM. Factors affecting ‘Hass’ avocado (Persea americana) fruit set in New Zealand. N Z Plant Prot. 2010;63:214–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gazit S. Pollination and fruit set of avocado. In: Proceedings of the first international tropical fruit short course: the avocado. Gainesville: University of Florida; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Stout AB. Avocado studies-pollination and setting of fruit. Fla Grower. 1925;31(4):6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ish-Am G, Lahav E. Evidence for a major role of honeybees (Apis mellifera) rather than wind during avocado (Persea americana mill.) pollination. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2011;86:589–94 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2011.11512808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sedgley M. Reduced pollen tube growth and the presence of callose in the pistil of the male floral stage of the avocado. Sci Hortic. 1977;7(1):27–36 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(77)90040-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ish-Am G, Eisikowitch D. Mobility of honey bees (Apidae, Apis mellifera L.) during foraging in avocado orchards. Apidologie. 1998;29:209–19 https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19980301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McGregor SE. Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. In: agriculture handbook no. 496. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ish-Am G. Avocado pollination: A review. In: New Zealand and Australia Avocado Grower’s Conference. Tauranga, New Zealand; 2005. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.632.3600&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garner LC, Ashworth VE, Clegg MT, Lovatt CJ. The impact of outcrossing on yields of ‘Hass’ avocado. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133(5):648–52 https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.133.5.648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Inoue H, Takahashi B. Studies on the bearing behavior and yield composition of the avocado tree. J Jpn Soc for Hortic Sci. 1990;59(3):487–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lahav E, Zamet D. Flowers, fruitlets and fruit drop in avocado trees. Rev Chapingo Ser Hort. 1999;5:95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peña JF, Carabalí A. Effect of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) density on pollination and fruit set of avocado (Persea americana mill.) cv. Hass. J Apic Sci. 2018;62(1):5–14 https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2018-0001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sedgley M. Anatomical investigation of abscissed avocado flowers and fruitlets. Ann Bot. 1980;46(6):771–7 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Castañeda-Vildózola A, Equihua-Martínez A, Valdés-Carrasco J, Barrientos-Priego AF, Ish-Am G, Gazit S. Insectos polinizadores del aguacatero en los estados de México y Michoacán. Rev Chapingo Ser Hort. 1999;5:129–36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ish-Am G, Eisikowitch D. The behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera) visiting avocado (Persea americana) flowers and their contribution to its pollination. J Apic Res. 1993;32:175–86 https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1993.11101303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ish-Am G, Regev Y, Peterman Y, Lahav E, Degani C, Elbatzri R, Gazit S. Improving avocado pollination with bumblebees: 3 seasons summary. Calif Avocado Soc Yearb. 1998;82:119–35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Afik O, Dag A, Shafir S. The effect of avocado (Persea americana) nectar composition on its attractiveness to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie. 2006;37(3):317–25 https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2005064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ish-Am G, Eisikowitch D. Low attractiveness of avocado (Persea americana mill.) flowers to honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) limits fruit set in Israel. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 1998;73:195–204 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1998.11510965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schaffer BA, Wolstenholme BN, Whiley AW. The avocado: botany, production and uses. 2nd. ed. New York: CABI Publishing; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Budds J. Power, nature and neoliberalism: the political ecology of water in Chile. Singap J Trop Geogr. 2004;25(3):322–42 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00189.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    De la Cuadra S. Determinación de la actividad polinizadora de la abeja (Apis mellifera) en la polinización del palto en la Zona Central de Chile. In: Proceedings VI World Avocado Congress. Viña Del Mar, Chile; 2007. http://www.avocadosource.com/WAC6/es/Extenso/3d-124.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Valdés CA. Evaluacion de la actividad de Apis mellifera L. y otros insectos asociados a la floracion del palto (Persea americana Mill.) cv. Hass en dos localidades de la Quinta region (Quillota y La Ligua): Undergraduate thesis: Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso; 2002.

  32. 32.

    Can-Alonzo C, Quezada-Euán JJG, Xiu-Ancona P, Moo-Valle H, Valdovinos-Nunez GR, Medina-Peralta S. Pollination of ‘criollo’avocados (Persea americana) and the behaviour of associated bees in subtropical Mexico. J Apic Res. 2005;44(1):3–8 https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2005.11101138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lesley JW, Bringhurst RS. Environmental conditions affecting pollination of avocados. Calif Avocado Soc Yearb. 1951;35:169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sedgley M, Annells CM. Flowering and fruit-set response to temperature in the avocado cultivar ‘Hass’. Sci Hortic. 1981;14(1):27–33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(81)90075-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stout AB. A study in cross pollination of avocados in southern California. Calif Avocado Assoc Ann Rpt. 1923;8:29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Elórtegui S, Moreira A. Parque Nacional la Campana. Origen de una reserva de la biosfera en Chile central. Santiago: Taller La Era; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Center for Climate and Resilience Research Database (CR2). 2020. http://explorador.cr2.cl/. Accessed 05 Mar 2020.

  38. 38.

    Luebert F, Pliscoff P. Sinopsis bioclimática y vegetacional de Chile. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017. Vienna, Austria. https://www.Rproject.org.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pattemore D, Buxton MN, Cutting BT, McBrydie H, Goodwin M, Dag A. Low overnight temperatures associated with a delay in ‘Hass’ avocado (Persea americana) female flower opening, leading to nocturnal flowering. J Pollinat Ecol. 2018;23(14):127–35 https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603%282018%2912.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sedgley M, Grant WJR. Effect of low temperatures during flowering on floral cycle and pollen tube growth in nine avocado cultivars. Sci Hortic. 1983;18(3):207–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(83)90023-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sedgley M. The effect of temperature on floral behaviour, pollen tube growth and fruit set in the avocado. J Hortic Sci. 1977;52:135–41 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1977.11514739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    González AV, Murúa M, Ramírez PA. Temporal and spatial variation of the pollinator assemblages in Alstroemeria ligtu (Alstroemeriaceae). Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2014;87(1):5 https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6317-87-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Medel R, González-Browne C, Salazar D, Ferrer P, Ehrenfeld M. The most effective pollinator principle applies to new invasive pollinators. Biol Lett. 2018;14(6):20180132 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0132.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Packer L, Zayed A, Grixti JC, Ruz L, Owen RE, Vivallo F, Toro H. Conservation genetics of potentially endangered mutualisms: reduced levels of genetic variation in specialist versus generalist bees. Biol Conserv. 2005;19(1):195–202 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00601.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Smith-Ramírez C, Martinez P, Nunez M, González C, Armesto JJ. Diversity, flower visitation frequency and generalism of pollinators in temperate rain forests of Chiloé Island, Chile. Bot J Linn Soc. 2005;147(4):399–416 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00388.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zayed A, Packer L, Grixti JC, Ruz L, Owen RE, Toro H. Increased genetic differentiation in a specialist versus a generalist bee: implications for conservation. Conserv Genet. 2005;6(6):1017–26 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9094-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Read SFJ, Howlett BG, Jesson LK, Pattemore DE. Insect visitors to avocado flowers in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. N Z Plant Prot. 2017;70:38–44 https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2017.70.25.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cossio-Vargas LE, Salazar-Garcia S, Gonzalez-Duran IJ, Medina-Torres R. Algunos aspectos reproductivos del aguacate ‘Hass’ en clima semicálido. In: Proceedings VI World Avocado Congress. Viña del Mar, Chile; 2007. http://www.avocadosource.com/WAC6/es/Extenso/3d-151.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Luisa Ruz Escudero of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaiso for identifying bees species and two anonymous reviewers for their comments, which improved the manuscript and Agricola Ocoa Ltda. for providing access to the study area.

Funding

This work was funded by Fondo de Innovación Para la Competitividad Región del Maule [FIC-30387076-0].

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Ecología de Abejas, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile

    Víctor H. Monzón, Patricio Avendaño-Soto, Rodrigo O. Araujo, Rubén Garrido & José N. Mesquita-Neto

  2. Centro de Investigación en Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile

    Rodrigo O. Araujo & José N. Mesquita-Neto

Authors
  1. Víctor H. Monzón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricio Avendaño-Soto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo O. Araujo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rubén Garrido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. José N. Mesquita-Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VHG, RG and JNM-N conceived the ideas and designed methodology; VHG, PAS, RG collected the data; JNM-N and ROA analyzed the data; VHG, JNM-N, ROA and RG led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José N. Mesquita-Neto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monzón, V.H., Avendaño-Soto, P., Araujo, R.O. et al. Avocado crops as a floral resource for native bees of Chile. Rev. Chil. de Hist. Nat. 93, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-020-00092-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Temperature
  • Mediterranean
  • Apis mellifera
  • Persea americana
  • Pollination

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural

ISSN: 0717-6317

Contact us