Open Access

Recent rates of carbon and nitrogen accumulation in peatlands of Isla Grande de Chiloé-Chile

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural201487:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-014-0026-y

Received: 3 March 2014

Accepted: 22 October 2014

Published: 5 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Peatlands play a key role in the global carbon cycle; these contain one third of the world's soil organic carbon, equivalent to more than half the amount of carbon in the atmosphere. Nevertheless, these ecosystems have been scarcely studied in southern South America. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the recent accumulation rates of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in two kinds of oligotrofic peatlands in Isla Grande de Chiloé (Chile).

Results

Using peat C and N content, dry bulk density, and Pb-210 dating, we determined the rates of N and C accumulation in profiles from five peatlands in the northern Chilean Patagonia. The recent rate of C accumulation (RERCA) ranges from 8.5 to 87.06 g C m−2 year−1, and the recent rate of N accumulation (RERNA) ranges from 0.15 to 2.37 g N m−2 year−1. The difference in RERCA and RERNA between glacial peatlands and anthropogenic peatlands was significant. One of the remarkable results is that accumulation of N and C are directly related.

Conclusions

This study contributes for a better understanding of the Patagonian peatlands of Chile. In addition, this research contributes by setting a basis for conducting further studies and for assessing the impacts of climate change on peatlands.

Keywords

Carbon accumulationNitrogen accumulationNorthern PatagoniaOligotrophic peatlandsPb-210

Background

A distinct characteristic of peatland ecosystems is a disequilibrium between primary production and decay; c. 2% to 16% of the biomass produced annually forms peat (Tolonen and Turunen [1996]). In these habitats, the rate of carbon (C) sequestration in natural peatlands is larger than the total rate of C losses; therefore, their C stock continues to increase (Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]). Peatlands have in the past 15,000 years withdrawn enormous amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere and stored it in their peat deposits (Yu et al. [2003]; Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]). They play a key role in the global carbon cycle and are influenced by global climate change. These habitats account for 3% to 6% of the Earth's land surface and contain around 600 gigatonnes of C (Charman [2002]; Charman et al. [2013]; Clymo et al. [1998]). This means that peat represents about one third of the total global soil C pool. It contains an equivalent of approximately two thirds of all C in the atmosphere and the same amount of C as all terrestrial biomass on earth (Joosten and Clarke [2002]). Peatlands are the most space-effective carbon stocks of all terrestrial ecosystems. In the (sub)polar zone, peatlands contain on average at least 3.5 times per ha, in the boreal zone 7 times, and in the tropical zone 10 times more C per ha than all other ecosystems (Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]).

Peatlands are unusual in greenhouse scenarios because they sequester the major greenhouse gas, CO2, from the atmosphere as peat. Nevertheless, on the other hand, they emit to it in large quantities both CO2 and the second most important greenhouse gas, CH4. Despite occupying a relatively small area of the earth's surface, 3% of the land and freshwater surface of the planet, these ecosystems process significant amounts of CO2, CH4, H2S, and N2O from the atmosphere. However, they can also become potential emitters of CO2 and CH4 if some of the factors involved in the development and dynamics of these ecosystems are destabilized. In this case, the potential impact of peatlands on the greenhouse effect and climate change would be decisive (Pontevedra Pombal et al. [2004]). When the normally wet peat soils are in contact with the air, these soils begin to oxidize and decompose, releasing CO2 (Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]). Some estimations indicate that peatland degradation contributes up to 0.8 gigatonne C per year (Trumper et al. [2009]). Peat accumulation shows a strong local and regional variation, and peat accumulation rates are dependent on climatic, hydrologic, and hydrochemical conditions (Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]). In this sense, nitrogen (N) deposition may also affect C accumulation through effects on plant productivity and rates of organic matter decomposition (Turunen et al. [2004]; Limpens and Berendse [2003]).

C accumulation in peat can be estimated by different methods and time scale. One of the methods is the recent rate of carbon accumulation (RERCA), and this refers to the fresh peat that is annually added to the peatland system (Joosten and Couwenberg [2008]; Rydin and Jeglum [2006]). This quantization is based on the column section between the surface and a given dated horizon in a surface core. Data of bulk density, C content, and chronologies are used (Tolonen and Turunen [1996]).

In Europe, North America, and China there have been conducted numerous studies on recent carbon dynamics in peatland (Gorham [1991]; Turunen et al. [2004]; Tolonen and Turunen [1996]; Pitkänen et al. [1999]; Bao et al. [2010]; Ali et al. [2008]; Pontevedra Pombal et al. [2004]). Nevertheless, similar studies are scarce in southern South America. In Chilean Patagonia, vast expanses of peatland can be found. A significant number of peatlands were formed by peat accumulation in open water after glacial retreat (Villagrán [1991]; Villagrán [1988]; Heusser [1984]), referred to in this paper as glaciogenic peatland. Nevertheless, in northern Patagonia, the use of fire and clearcutting since the middle of the 19th century in places with low drainage have created areas of wetlands dominated by species of the genus Sphagnum L. (Díaz et al. [2008]; Zegers et al. [2006]). When Tepualia stipularis (Hook. & Arn.) Griseb. forests on poorly drained soil are burned or cleared, waterlogged conditions impair the recolonization of forests and stimulate Sphagnum colonization (Díaz et al. [2007]; Díaz and Silva [2012]). These sites have been referred to as secondary or anthropogenic peatlands (Díaz et al. [2008]).

The rate of C sequestration in peatlands is a crucial element in understanding the global C cycle and has been estimated on different timescales to ascertain the role of peatlands in global warming in the context of rising atmospheric CO2 (Bao et al. [2010]; Joosten and Clarke [2002]). Added to this is that a better management of ecosystem carbon stocks and fluxes can substantially contribute to reducing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations (Joosten [2011]).

Therefore, considering the above background, the aim of this paper is to describe some aspects of C and N accumulation through a comparative analysis of RERCA and the recent rate of nitrogen accumulation (RERNA) in anthropogenic and glaciogenic peatlands of Isla Grande de Chiloé (Chile) and also to establish the relationship between these rates.

Methods

Study area

The study area is situated on the Isla Grande de Chiloé, Región de Los Lagos in Chile (42° to 43° S and 73° to 75° W). Chiloé's climate is wet temperate with a strong oceanic influence (di Castri and Hajek [1976]). It has an annual mean temperature of 9.6°C (Carmona et al. [2010]), and its annual rainfall ranges from 1,900 to 2,300 mm (CONAF [2009]), reaching even between 5,000 to 6,000 mm in some areas (Pérez et al. [2003]).

We selected five sites located in the northern and central parts of the island (Figure 1). Two kinds of Sphagnum peatlands were studied, which were defined according to their origin and their characteristic vegetation (Díaz et al. [2008]). The first type, glaciogenic peatland, was originated after the last glaciation. The second type, anthropogenic peatland, corresponds to flooded areas colonized by Sphagnum moss after the burning or logging of forests in areas with poor drainage soils (Zegers et al. [2006]; Díaz et al. [2008]). The two study areas representing the glaciogenic peatland type were Los Caulles (CA) and Púlpito (PL), and the three study areas representing the anthropogenic peatland were Senda Darwin (SD), Río Chepu (CH), and Teguel (TG).
Figure 1

Study sites on Isla Grande de Chiloé. Glaciogenic peatlands: PL, Púlpito; CA, Caulles. Anthropogenic peatlands: SD, Senda Darwin; CH, Río Chepu; and TG, Teguel.

Core samplings

The oligotrophic peatlands sampled were constituted of Sphagnum peat mainly of Sphagnum magellanicum Brid. In each locality, we took a short peat monolith (30 × 30 × 45 to 50 cm) with a sharpened metal sheet tin following the recommendations of De Vleeschouwer et al. ([2010]). The monoliths of peat were carefully extracted, wrapped in foil paper, and transported flat in rigid cases to be fractioned in subsequent hours. Approximately 4 to 5 cm from the outer layer of each monolith was removed to discard the material that was altered in the extraction and transportation. The monoliths were divided into intervals of 1 to 2 cm with a stainless steel saw.

Each segment was separated into two sub-samples: a small portion of 2 cm3 to calculate bulk density and the other one with the rest of the material. These samples were deposited in polyethylene bags and stored at 4°C. The analyses were performed on some sections of the monoliths in non-continuous depths.

Physicochemical analysis

Water content and dry bulk density were obtained from weight loss by drying of a known volume of peat section at 105°C for 12 h. The first one was calculated from the mass difference and the second one was calculated from stable weight and known volume (Martínez Cortizas et al. [2009]; Bao et al. [2010]; Sadzawka et al. [2006]; Wang et al. [2004]). Ash and organic matter content were determined by calcination at 550°C for 6 h in a muffle furnace (Martínez Cortizas et al. [2009]; Bao et al. [2010]; Sadzawka et al. [2006]; Wang et al. [2004]). Following the procedures of Tolonen and Turunen ([1996]), Clymo et al. ([1998]) and Bao et al. ([2010]), organic C content was calculated by multiplying the organic matter content by 0.50. N content was analyzed by complete combustion at 950°C using an elementar analyzer and following the protocol USDA ([1996]). C/N ratio was established as the ratio of total C and total N. Calcination and C/N ratio were performed at Centro de Espectrometría Atómica of Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Spain) and Laboratorio de Suelo of Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (Chile).

Radiometric measurements and data analysis

The activities of Pb-210 were measured by gamma-ray spectrometry using hyper-pure germanium detectors in all areas sampled. However, in CAU and PUL, the concentration of Pb-210 activity decreased to the limits of detection. In these localities, descendants of Pb-210 and Po-210 were measured with alpha spectroscopy using passivated ion-implanted silicon (PIPS). These analyses were performed at Servicio de Radioisótopos of Universidad de Sevilla (Spain). The Constant Initial Concentration (CIC) model of Appleby and Oldfield ([1978]) and Sánchez-Cabeza and Ruiz-Fernández ([2012]) was applied to calculate the ages of peat layers.

We estimated RERCA and RERNA following the Bao et al. ([2010]) model which used g dry bulk density, age, and C or N contents, as appropriate.

STATISTICA 7.0 (StatSoft [2004]) was used for statistics analysis. The normality of variables was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Pearson correlations between RERCA and RERNA were calculated. We used one-way ANOVA to compare C and N accumulation between glaciogenic and anthropogenic peatlands.

Results

Water content and dry bulk density

The water content of the peat samples ranged from 735% to 1,927%, with outliers (206% and 327%) in the samples of SD. In SD and CA, a slight decrease of water content was observed in the deeper layers (Figure 2A). In the other localities, the water content shows slight variations along the depth.
Figure 2

Variation of water content, dry bulk density, Pb-210 activity, C and N contents, and C/N ratio. Variations of (A) water content (%), (B) dry bulk density (g cm−3), (C) Pb-210 activity (Bq kg−1), (D) C content (%), (E) N content (%), and (F) C/N ratio, according to depth (cm). Localities: PL, Púlpito; SD, Senda Darwin; CH, Río Chepu; TG, Teguel; and CA, Caulles.

The ranges of dry bulk density were 0.0100 to 0.065 g cm−3. In SD, the dry bulk densities increased with depth. In contrast, we observed the opposite trend in CH; the density decreases to deeper layers. In the other three sites, the dry bulk density shows no significant variations along the profiles (Figure 2B).

Radioisotope chronology

In SD, TG, and CH peatlands, the activities (Bq kg−1) (Figure 2C) of Pb-210 and Ra-226 were well-defined. However, in CA and PL from the third sample of each core, the activity decreased to the limits of detection of the technique. The activity was detected until 21 to 29-cm depth in glaciogenic peatlands and 28 to 37 cm in anthropogenic peatlands. Table 1 shows the chronologies (years AD) inferred from the Pb-210 using the CIC model.
Table 1

Recent rates of C (RERCA) and N (RERNA) accumulation in the studied localities

Locality

Depth (cm)

Chronology (AD)

RERCA (g C m−2 year−1)

RERNA (g N m−2 year−1)

SD

6

1994

24.24

0.42

14

1944

33.50

0.79

27

1900

40.57

1.11

37

1925

56.88

1.53

CH

6

1983

66.49

2.37

15

1961

50.08

2.14

28

1897

35.70

1.61

TG

6

1997

40.62

0.60

15

1995

87.06

1.52

28

1982

46.85

1.07

CA

7

1989

14.81

0.33

16

1978

23.06

0.57

29

1834

8.50

0.27

PL

5

1853

5.88

0.15

11

1796

10.75

0.46

21

1632

11.42

0.51

C, N and C/N

The calculated organic C values show differences among localities. The higher mean values ± SD were observed in PL (50.03% ± 2.05%, n = 3), CA (47.3% ± 3.74%, n = 3), and CH (46.93% ± 1%, n = 3). The other two sites reported slightly lower mean values: TG (44.8% ± 1.8%, n = 3) and SD (39.6% ± 7.23%, n = 4) (Figure 2D). The mean values of the C content were higher in glaciogenic peatlands.

The percentage of N varied between 0.74 and 2.28. The highest mean values ± SD were reported in CH (1.93% ± 0.3%, n = 3) and PL (1.9% ± 0.58%, n = 3); secondly, CA (1.26% ± 0.34%, n = 3), and then SD (0.93% ± 0.19%, n = 4) and TG (0.83% ± 0.21%, n = 3) (Figure 2E).

The ranges of C/N ratios were 21.59 and 67.93. The highest mean values ± SD were found in TG (56.3 ± 12.1, n = 3) and SD (43.7 ± 10.2, n = 3), then CA (38.9 ± 6.8, n = 3), CH (24.5 ± 3.1, n = 3), and finally PL (28.1 ± 9.1, n = 3). In C/N ratio, we observed a slight trend to decrease at greater depths (Figure 2F).

RERCA and RERNA

The RERCA estimated are presented in Table 1. The location that showed the highest average rate ± SD was TG (58.18 ± 25.20 g C m−2 year−1, n = 3), secondly CH (50.75 ± 15.40 g C m−2 year−1, n = 3), then SD (32.77 ± 13.78 g C m−2 year−1, n = 4), CA (15.45 ± 7.2 g C m−2 year−1, n = 3), and finally PL (9.35 ± 3.02 g C m−2 year−1, n = 3). It is noted that anthropogenic peatlands (TG, SD, and CH) have higher RERCA than glaciogenic peatlands (PL and CA) in the last 100 years. Moreover, there is a highly significant difference between the two types of habitats as reported by one-way ANOVA (F1, 14 = 21.231, p = 0.0004).

The Table 1 shows the estimated values of RERNA. The overall mean ± SD was 0.97 ± 0.68 g N m−2 year−1 (n = 16). The location that presented the highest average rate ± SD was CH (2.04 ± 0.39 g N m−2 year−1, n = 3), secondly TG (1.06 ± 0.46 g N m−2 year−1, n = 3), and then SD (0.77 ± 0.47 g N m−2 year−1, n = 4), CA (0.39 ± 0.15 g N m−2 year−1, n = 3), and PL (0.37 ± 0.19 g N m−2 year−1, n = 3).

According to the results of one-way ANOVA, a highly significant difference between mean RERNA of anthropogenic and glaciogenic peatlands was observed (F1, 14 = 12.09; p = 0.0037).

On the other hand, a strong, highly significant, and directly proportional relation (r = 0.81; n = 16; p = 0.0001) between RERNA and RERCA was observed. Figure 3 shows the Pearson's correlation.
Figure 3

Relationship between RERNA and RERCA in peat profiles.

Discussion

Globally, our results showed that there is a difference between the two types of peatlands studied and throughout the period studied in the content and storage of C and N. Our study shows that glaciogenic peatlands present higher values of C content in relation to anthropogenic peatlands. This difference may be related to the trophic status of peatlands and the source of nutrients. Martínez Cortizas et al. ([2009]) reported that ombrotrophic peatlands have much higher proportions of carbon than minerotrophic peatlands. These results concur with León ([2012]) who found that some anthropogenic peatlands as SD have transitional characteristics between minerotrophic and ombrotrophic, in contrast to PL or CA that are clearly ombrotrophic.

In general terms, we also note that N% increased slightly in the first centimeters of the profiles. These results are consistent with other studies conducted in southern hemisphere islands where ombrotrophic peatlands with oceanic influence have nitrogen concentrations that increase progressively in the first centimeters deep, coinciding with the fluctuation zone above the water table (Damman [1988]). This increase may be explained by the leaching of nitrogen from the well-drained higher layers (Damman [1988]; Pontevedra Pombal et al. [2004]). Kuhry and Vitt ([1996]) also show that nitrogen is lost from acrotelmo through denitrification, surface runoff, and erosion. Nevertheless, in bogs, most nitrogen is lost while being restrained in catotelmo.

According to our results, C/N ratio values were similar to those reported for peatlands of northwestern Spain with an average of 34 (Pontevedra Pombal et al. [2004]) and near the range reported for ombrotrophic peatlands in southern Sweden (Malmer et al. [1997]). Nonetheless, our results are well below the highest values found in Tierra del Fuego where ratios reach values over 250 (Kleinebecker et al. [2008]). The C/N ratio has been considered as an important indicator of decomposition of organic matter (Martínez Cortizas et al. [2009]). High-mean C/N ratios found in ombrotrophic peatlands have been attributed to the low microbial activity in Sphagnum-rich peat due to the decomposition resistance of this material and the lack of easily assimilated energy, leading to the lack of biotic degradation of the organic matter (Pontevedra Pombal et al. [2004]).

On the other hand, mean values of RERNA fluctuated depending on the site (0.15 to 2.37 g N m−2 year−1). These values are mostly within the ranges given for other geographic areas such as southern Sweden (2 g N m−2 year−1) (Malmer and Holm [1984]) or eastern Canada (1.4 to 3.2 g N m−2 year−1) (Turunen et al. [2004]). Nevertheless, in some sampled locations, significantly lower values were observed compared with those reported for the northern hemisphere. RERNA does not show a common pattern throughout cores: in two sites, RERNA increases with depth; in one site decreases; and in the other two sites increases and decreases. Therefore, to understand the variation of nitrogen, it is necessary to consider specific covariables for each study area, such as precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen atmospheric deposition, among others (Turunen et al. [2004]).

We also noted that anthropogenic peatland sites (TG, SD, and CH) have higher accumulation rates of carbon during the last 100 years than glaciogenic peatland sites (PL and CA), which may indicate that anthropogenic peatlands, being novel ecosystems, are more active. Several studies in boreal Sphagnum peatlands shown that carbon accumulation rates are significantly higher in recent peat deposits, and the average carbon accumulation decreases over time by the slow decomposition that takes place in deeper and anoxic layers of peat (Tolonen and Turunen [1996]; Turunen et al. [2004]; Gorham [1991]; Clymo et al. [1998]). Nevertheless, it is important to note that the average of carbon percentage is higher in glacial peatlands, which would store carbon more efficiently.

The results of the five profiles do not show a general trend of increase or decrease in the carbon accumulation rates in relation to depth. Specifically, the observed trend changes depending on the site. The variation between the profiles could be attributed to intrinsic characteristics of the sites such as geological or climatic conditions, as well as variations of the sampling site nanotopography. Turunen et al. ([2004]) found a substantial variation in carbon accumulation between and within peatlands, depending if the profile had been extracted in mounds or depressions. This pattern was also reported by Økland and Ohlson ([1998]).

In an exploratory way, climatic variables with RERCA and RERNA were correlated. Precipitation and mean annual temperature data were obtained from the two closest meteorological stations to the study sites: Ancud (north side of the island) and Puerto Montt (63 km north of the island). Nonetheless, no significant correlation was observed. In our opinion, these results could be attributed to the lack of quality in the used data rather than to a non-significant correlation between accumulation and climatic conditions, as there is a lack of historical climate information on the island.

Furthermore, our results also show a strong and highly significant correlation between carbon and nitrogen accumulation rates, which is consistent with the patterns found by Moore et al. ([2005]). This important relationship can be understood considering that nitrogen is a limiting nutrient in these ecosystems (Malmer [1990]) and that it is involved in productivity and rates of peat decomposition.

Conclusions

In this study, we have presented the recent accumulation rates of carbon and nitrogen from a type of ecosystem that has great influence on the global carbon balance. On the basis of these results, we noted the need for more detailed and accurate studies of chronologies in order to compare values of carbon accumulation with obtained data for other geographic areas. Similarly, there are important questions related to the influence of the deposition of atmospheric nitrogen on carbon accumulation and biomass production of Sphagnum and associated vascular plants. On the other hand, it is also highly relevant to continue the study of carbon dynamics in the Patagonian peatlands due to the high threat faced by the exploitation of peat and live moss and for the relevance these ecosystems have on climate change. Finally, this research also contributes by setting a basis for conducting further studies and for assessing the impacts of climate change on peatlands.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants AECID A/025081/2009, Cooperación al Desarrollo UCM 4138114, and AECID A/030011/2011. We are very grateful to Dr. (c) Alfonso Benítez-Mora for his assistance in the field. We wish to thank the Fundación Senda Darwin, Aserradero A.R.P., Chepu adventures, I. Municipalidad de Dalcahue, and CONAF Chiloé for their logistic support during field work and Prof. Gracielle Pereira Rocha at the Academic Writing Center from the U.S. Embassy in Chile for her assistance with English language editing.

C. A. León acknowledges the support of the doctoral fellowship provided by CONICYT-Gobierno de Chile.

This is a contribution to the Research Program of LTSER-Chile network at Senda Darwin Biological Station, Chiloé, Chile.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins
(2)
Departamento de Biología Vegetal I, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

References

  1. Ali AA, Ghaleb B, Garneau M, Asnong H, Loisel J: Recent peat accumulation rates in minerotrophic peatlands of the Bay James region, Eastern Canada, inferred by 210Pb and 137Cs radiometric techniques. Appl Radiat Isotopes 2008,66(10):1350–1358. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Appleby PG, Oldfield F: The calculation of lead-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. CATENA 1978,5(1):1–8. 10.1016/S0341-8162(78)80002-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao K, Yu X, Jia L, Wang G: Recent carbon accumulation in Changbai Mountain Peatlands, Northeast China. Mt Res Dev 2010,30(1):33–41. 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00054.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmona MR, Aravena JC, Bustamante-Sanchez MA, Celis-Diez JL, Charrier A, Díaz IA, Díaz-Forestier J, Díaz MF, Gaxiola A, Gutiérrez AG, Hernandez-Pellicer C, Ippi S, Jaña-Prado R, Jara-Arancio P, Jimenez J, Manuschevich D, Necochea P, Nuñez-Avila M, Papic C, Pérez C, Pérez F, Reid S, Rojas L, Salgado B, Smith-Ramírez C, Troncoso A, Vásquez RA, Willson MF, Rozzi R, Armesto JJ: Estación Biológica Senda Darwin: investigación ecológica de largo plazo en la interfase ciencia-sociedad. Rev Chil Hist Nat 2010, 83: 113–142. 10.4067/S0716-078X2010000100007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Charman D: Peatlands and Environmental Change. J. Wiley & Sons, London & New York; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Charman DJ, Beilman DW, Blaauw M, Booth RK, Brewer S, Chambers FM, Christen JA, Gallego-Sala A, Harrison SP, Hughes PDM, Jackson ST, Korhola A, Mauquoy D, Mitchell FJG, Prentice IC, van der Linden M, De Vleeschouwer F, Yu ZC, Alm J, Bauer IE, Corish YMC, Garneau M, Hohl V, Huang Y, Karofeld E, Le Roux G, Loisel J, Moschen R, Nichols JE, Nieminen TM, et al.: Climate-related changes in peatland carbon accumulation during the last millennium. Biogeosciences 2013,10(2):929–944. 10.5194/bg-10-929-2013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Clymo RS, Turunen J, Tolonen K: Carbon accumulation in peatland. Oikos 1998,81(2):368–388. 10.2307/3547057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Plan de Acción Provincial Chiloé - Plan de Gestión Territorial. Oficina Provincial Chiloé - Corporación Nacional Forestal, Castro; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. Damman AWH: Regulation of nitrogen removal and retention in Sphagnum bogs and other peatlands. Oikos 1988,51(3):291–305. 10.2307/3565310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vleeschouwer F, Chambers FM, Swindles GT: Coring and sub-sampling of peatlands for palaeoenvironmental research. Mires Peat 2010, 7: 1–10.Google Scholar
  11. di Castri F, Hajek ER: Bioclimatología de Chile. Editorial Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Díaz MF, Silva W: Improving harvesting techniques to ensure Sphagnum regeneration in Chilean peatlands. Chil J Agr Res 2012,72(2):296–300. 10.4067/S0718-58392012000200021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Díaz MF, Bigelow S, Armesto JJ: Alteration of the hydrologic cycle due to forest clearing and its consequences for rainforest succession. Forest Ecol Manag 2007,244(1–3):32–40. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Díaz MF, Larraín J, Zegers G, Tapia C: Caracterización florística e hidrológica de turberas de la Isla Grande de Chiloé, Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 2008, 81: 445–468. 10.4067/S0716-078X2008000400002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorham E: Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl 1991,1(2):182–195. 10.2307/1941811View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Heusser CJ: Late-glacial-holocene climate of the Lake District of Chile. Quatern Res 1984, 22: 77–90. 10.1016/0033-5894(84)90008-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Joosten H, Clarke D: Wise use of mires and peatlands. Background and principles including a framework for decision-making. International Mire Conservation Group & International Peat Society, Saarijarvi, Finland; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Joosten H, Couwenberg J, et al.: Peatlands and carbon. In Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report Global Environment Centre. Edited by: Parish F, Sirin A, Charman D. Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International, Wageningen; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Joosten H: Selling peatland rewetting on the compliance carbon market. In Carbon credits from peatland rewetting: climate, biodiversity, land use. Edited by: Tanneberger F, Wichtmann W. Schweizerbart science, Stuttgart, Germany; 2011.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinebecker T, Holzel N, Andreas V: South Patagonian ombrotrophic bog vegetation reflects biogeochemical gradients at the landscape level. J Veg Sci 2008,19(2):151–160. 10.3170/2008-8-18370View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhry P, Vitt DH: Fossil carbon/nitrogen ratios as a measure of peat decomposition. Ecology 1996,77(1):271–275. 10.2307/2265676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. León CA: Caracterización florística y ecológica de turberas esfagnosas de la isla Grande de Chiloé-Chile: una herramienta para la conservación y el desarrollo sostenible. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid; 2012.Google Scholar
  23. Limpens J, Berendse F: How litter quality affects mass loss and N loss from decomposing Sphagnum. Oikos 2003,103(3):537–547. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12707.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Malmer N: Constant or increasing nitrogen concentrations in Sphagnum mosses on mires in southern Sweden during the last few decades. Aquilo Ser Bot 1990, 28: 57–65.Google Scholar
  25. Malmer N, Holm E: Variation in the C/N-quotient of peat in relation to decomposition rate and age determination with 210Pb. Oikos 1984, 43: 171–182. 10.2307/3544766View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Malmer N, Svensson G, Wallén B: Mass balance and nitrogen accumulation in hummocks on a South Swedish bog during the late Holocene. Ecography 1997,20(6):535–549. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00422.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Martínez Cortizas A, Pontevedra Pombal X, Nóvoa Muñoz JC, Rodríguez Fernández R, López-Sáez JA: Turberas ácidas de esfagnos. In Bases ecológicas preliminares para la conservación de los tipos de hábitat de interés comunitario en España. Edited by: Martínez Cortizas A. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid; 2009.Google Scholar
  28. Moore T, Blodau C, Turunen J, Roulet N, Richard PJH: Patterns of nitrogen and sulfur accumulation and retention in ombrotrophic bogs, eastern Canada. Glob Chang Biol 2005,11(2):356–367. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00882.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Økland RH, Ohlson M: Age-depth relationships in Scandinavian surface peat: a quantitative analysis. Oikos 1998,82(1):29–36. 10.2307/3546914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pérez CA, Armesto JJ, Torrealba C, Carmona MR: Litterfall dynamics and nitrogen use efficiency in two evergreen temperate rainforests of southern Chile. Austral Ecol 2003,28(6):591–600. 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01315.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pitkänen A, Turunen J, Tolonen K: The role of fire in the carbon dynamics of a mire, eastern Finland. Holocene 1999,9(4):453–462. 10.1191/095968399674919303View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Pontevedra Pombal X, Martínez Cortizas A, Buurman P: Las turberas de montaña de Galicia como sumideros de carbono. Edafología 2004,11(3):295–307.Google Scholar
  33. Rydin H, Jeglum JK (2006) The Biology of Peatlands. Biology of Habitats. Oxford University Press, ᅟGoogle Scholar
  34. Sadzawka A, Carrasco MA, Grez R, Mora ML, Flores P, Neaman A: Métodos de análisis de suelos recomendados para los suelos de Chile. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Santiago, Chile; 2006.Google Scholar
  35. Sánchez-Cabeza JA, Ruiz-Fernández AC: 210Pb sediment radiochronology: an integrated formulation and classification of dating models. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2012, 82: 183–200. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.12.024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. StatSoft (2004) STATISTICA for Windows, user’s guide (version 7.0) StatSoft Inc, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  37. Tolonen K, Turunen J: Accumulation rates of carbon in mires in Finland and implications for climate change. Holocene 1996,6(2):171–178. 10.1177/095968369600600204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Trumper K, Bertzky M, Dickson B, van der Heijden G, Jenkins M, Manning P: The Natural Fix? The Role of Ecosystems in Climate Mitigation. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK; 2009.Google Scholar
  39. Turunen J, Roulet NT, Moore TR, Richard PJH: Nitrogen deposition and increased carbon accumulation in ombrotrophic peatlands in eastern Canada. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2004,18(GB3002):12.Google Scholar
  40. USDA (1996) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report N° 42. Version 3.0. United States Department of Agriculture Washington, District of Columbia, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Villagrán C: Late quaternary vegetation of Southern Isla Grande de Chiloé, Chile. Quatern Res 1988, 30: 304–314. 10.1016/0033-5894(88)90006-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Villagrán C: Historia de los bosques templados del sur de Chile durante el Tardiglacial y Postglacial. Rev Chil Hist Nat 1991, 64: 447–460.Google Scholar
  43. Wang GP, Liu JS, Tang J: The long-term nutrient accumulation with respect to anthropogenic impacts in the sediments from two freshwater marshes (Xianghai Wetlands, Northeast China). Water Res 2004,38(20):4462–4474. 10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yu ZC, Vitt DH, Campbell ID, Apps MJ: Understanding Holocene peat accumulation pattern of continental fens in western Canada. Can J Bot 2003,81(3):267–282. 10.1139/b03-016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zegers G, Larraín J, Díaz MF, Armesto JJ: Impacto ecológico y social de la explotación de pomponales y turberas de Sphagnum en la Isla Grande de Chiloé. A&D 2006, 22: 28–34.Google Scholar

Copyright

© León and Oliván; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.