Skip to main content

Table 8 Output of SIMPER analyses obtained from abundance species data. In bold the most representative taxa for dissimilarity among groups (MYT, SAL, REF sites)

From: Macrofauna community patterns in a Chiloe Island channel used intensely for aquaculture: the ecological status of its benthic environment

Groups MYT & SAL
Average dissimilarity = 82.45 MYT SAL     
Taxa Av. Ab Av. Ab Av. Diss Diss/SD Cont % Cum %
Chaetozone sp. 1.54 1.06 3.11 1.18 3.77 3.77
Nematoda 1.31 0.86 3.07 1.01 3.72 7.49
Cirratulidae 0.43 0.99 2.48 0.88 3.01 10.5
Lumbrineris sp. 1.18 0.46 2.22 1.29 2.69 13.19
Prionospio sp. 0.82 0.48 2.12 0.84 2.57 15.76
Paraonidae 0.69 0.6 2.04 0.96 2.48 18.24
Amphipoda 0.83 0.64 2.03 1.08 2.46 20.7
Bivalvia 0.61 0.84 2.03 1.04 2.46 23.16
Ampharetidae 0.65 0.54 1.99 0.84 2.42 25.58
Glycera sp. 0.78 0.41 1.79 1.02 2.17 27.75
Groups MYT & REF
Average dissimilarity = 73.88 MYT REF     
Taxa Av. Ab Av. Ab Av. Diss Diss/SD Cont % Cum %
Nematoda 1.31 1.42 2.98 1.12 4.03 4.03
Bivalvia 0.61 1.82 2.78 1.52 3.77 7.79
Chaetozone sp. 1.54 1.31 2.72 1.19 3.69 11.48
Prionospio sp. 0.82 1.09 2.45 1 3.31 14.79
Ostracoda 0.42 1.32 2.35 1.24 3.18 17.98
Paraonidae 0.69 0.88 2.08 0.92 2.82 20.8
Ampharetidae 0.65 0.85 2.01 0.99 2.72 23.52
Amphipoda 0.83 1.11 1.99 1.15 2.7 26.22
Glycera sp. 0.78 0.78 1.93 1.01 2.61 28.82
Caecum chilense 0.51 0.63 1.9 0.72 2.57 31.39
Groups SAL & REF
Average dissimilarity = 78.16 SAL REF     
Taxa Av. Ab Av. Ab Av. Diss Diss/SD Cont % Cum %
Nematoda 0.86 1.42 2.77 1.08 3.55 3.55
Bivalvia 0.84 1.82 2.7 1.28 3.45 7
Ostracoda 0.17 1.32 2.67 1.26 3.41 10.41
Chaetozone sp. 1.06 1.31 2.64 1.19 3.38 13.79
Cirratulidae 0.99 0.76 2.6 0.9 3.33 17.12
Prionospio sp. 0.48 1.09 2.28 1.02 2.91 20.03
Paraonidae 0.6 0.88 2.13 0.98 2.73 22.76
Amphipoda 0.64 1.11 2.11 1.21 2.7 25.46
Lumbrineris sp. 0.46 1.08 1.93 1.29 2.47 27.94
Glycera sp. 0.41 0.78 1.9 0.94 2.43 30.37