Table 3 Estimated effects of protected areas on poverty in Chile. The main explanatory variable is a continuous variable equal to the fraction of the unit’s area that is protected
From: The impact of protected areas on poverty: evidence from Chile
Outcome of interest: poverty index | ||
|---|---|---|
Main model under new specification | Alternative model under new specification | |
(1) | (2) | |
Fraction of the unit’s area protected | -0.010 (0.006) | 0.009 (0.017) |
Fraction of the unit’s area protected Patagonia | -0.024 (0.018) | |
\(log(population)\) | 0.259 (0.196) | 0.259 (0.197) |
Constant | -3.432 (2.305) | -3.431 (2.309) |
Unit-fixed effect | Yes | Yes |
Year-fixed effect | Yes | Yes |
No. of observations | 534 | 534 |
\({R}^{2}\) | 0.913 | 0.914 |