Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Behavioural intentions towards threatened Chilean species reported by peasants ( n= 37) from Maulino forest

From: Conservation of biodiversity in private lands: are Chilean landowners willing to keep threatened species in their lands?

Species (local name (scientific name)) Behavioural intentions n(%) Likelihood-ratio tests between speciesa
Positive Neutral Negative Ppud Ca WA Lc Lgr MF Gk Ppun Lgu Ng No
Pudu (Pudu puda) 35 (94.6) 2 (5.4) 0 (0.0) - 7.5* 1.4 8.1* 9.8** 28.7** 27.9** 22.1** 16.2** 43.9** 46.5**
Chilean pigeon (Columba araucana) 31 (83.8) 1 (2.7) 5 (13.5)   - 1.5 8.1* 9.8** 9.8** 10.5** 19.9** 16.3** 20.5** 22.5**
Wild animals 31 (83.8) 0 (0.0) 6 (16.2)    - 5.5* 9.8** 9.8*** 31.4** 26.7** 15.9** 17.2** 19.1**
Culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) 22 (59.5) 0 (0.0) 15 (40.5)     - 1.7 1.7 4.5 31.3** 3.7 3.5*** 4.4*
Grey fox (Lycalopex griseus) 19 (51.4) 1 (2.7) 17 (45.9)      - 0.0 1.1 26.8** 0.9 3.0 3.7
Maulino forest 19 (51.4) 1 (2.7) 17 (45.9)       - 1.1 26.8** 0.89 3.1 3.7
Queule (Gomortega keule) 18 (48.7) 3 (8.1) 16 (43.2) -       - 19.5** 1.9 5.9*** 6.6*
Pitao (Pitavia punctata) 18 (48.7) 16 (43.2) 3 (8.1)         - 12.4** 40.1** 41.6**
Kodkod (Leopardus guigna) 15 (40.5) 1 (2.7) 21 (56.8)          - 1.5 1.7
Hualo (Nothofagus glauca) 14 (37.8) 0 (0.0) 23 (62.2)           - 0.06
Roble (Nothofagus obliqua) 13 (35.1) 0 (0.0) 24 (64.9)            -
  1. aColumns in likelihood-ratio tests between species correspond to each species in the list. Level of significance at *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.01.