Conservation of biodiversity in private lands: are Chilean landowners willing to keep threatened species in their lands?

Table 2 Behavioural intentions towards threatened Chilean species reported by peasants ( n = 37) from Maulino forest

Species (local name (scientific name))	Behavioural intentions n(%)			Likelihood-ratio tests between species^a
Species (local name (scientific name))	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Ppud	Ca	WA	Lc	Lgr	MF	Gk	Ppun	Lgu	Ng	No
Pudu (Pudu puda)	35 (94.6)	2 (5.4)	0 (0.0)	-	7.5^*	1.4	8.1^*	9.8^**	28.7^**	27.9^**	22.1^**	16.2^**	43.9^**	46.5^**
Chilean pigeon (Columba araucana)	31 (83.8)	1 (2.7)	5 (13.5)		-	1.5	8.1^*	9.8^**	9.8^**	10.5^**	19.9^**	16.3^**	20.5^**	22.5^**
Wild animals	31 (83.8)	0 (0.0)	6 (16.2)			-	5.5^*	9.8^**	9.8^***	31.4^**	26.7^**	15.9^**	17.2^**	19.1^**
Culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus)	22 (59.5)	0 (0.0)	15 (40.5)				-	1.7	1.7	4.5	31.3^**	3.7	3.5^***	4.4^*
Grey fox (Lycalopex griseus)	19 (51.4)	1 (2.7)	17 (45.9)					-	0.0	1.1	26.8^**	0.9	3.0	3.7
Maulino forest	19 (51.4)	1 (2.7)	17 (45.9)						-	1.1	26.8^**	0.89	3.1	3.7
Queule (Gomortega keule)	18 (48.7)	3 (8.1)	16 (43.2)	-						-	19.5^**	1.9	5.9^***	6.6^*
Pitao (Pitavia punctata)	18 (48.7)	16 (43.2)	3 (8.1)								-	12.4^**	40.1^**	41.6^**
Kodkod (Leopardus guigna)	15 (40.5)	1 (2.7)	21 (56.8)									-	1.5	1.7
Hualo (Nothofagus glauca)	14 (37.8)	0 (0.0)	23 (62.2)										-	0.06
Roble (Nothofagus obliqua)	13 (35.1)	0 (0.0)	24 (64.9)											-

^aColumns in likelihood-ratio tests between species correspond to each species in the list. Level of significance at *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.01.